Blog Layout

Gifting to Charity While Paying Yourself? Yes, It's Possible

Greg Dowell • Nov 14, 2023

How to make doing good a little less frightening financially.

Many individuals are familiar, at least somewhat, with the ability to take some (or all) of their required minimum distribution (RMD) from an individual retirement account (IRA) and donate it to a qualified nonprofit organization.  This process, known as making a qualified charitable distribution (QCD), eliminates the need to report the RMD as taxable income; this can be a way to avoid having the RMD increase taxable income and popping the taxpayer into a higher tax bracket.  Conversely, if the RMD that is directed to charity does not have to be counted as income, the amount donated to charity does not qualify for a charitable donation.  While the lack of a charitable deduction may give some people pause, overall it can be a more cost-effective way to donate to a nonprofit organization.  This is a good strategy to meet someone's commitments to fund nonprofit organizations, while keeping the IRA distribution off of an individual's income tax return.  A taxpayer is able to make a QCD if the taxpayer is 70 1/2 years old as of January 1, 2023.  Just to mention it, a donor advised fund is not a permitted recipient for a QCD.  The annual limit on the amount of a QCD in 2023 is $100,000 per taxpayer (a spouse will have an additional $100,000 QCD limit).  The annual $100,000 limit will increase in future years, as it is indexed for inflation, beginning in 2024.


Beginning with 2023, there is another new strategy available that has not received much attention.  In this riff on the above qualified charitable distribution, an individual can make a donation to a gift annuity to fund a nonprofit (known as a charitable gift annuity), and the individual will receive an annuity of a fixed amount each year in return, either over a fixed number of years or over the donor's life (and even over the donor's spouse's life).


First, a little background information on RMDs.  Every taxpayer who has a traditional IRA (an IRA that is not a Roth IRA) is required to take a minimum distribution upon reaching a prescribed age.  The purpose of this is to avoid a massive building up of IRA values and to trigger the need to pay taxes on an annual basis on a certain amount of retirement income.  The prescribed date when distributions were required was when a taxpayer turned 70 1/2 years old.  Recently, that age was bumped up to age 73 if you reach age 72 after Dec. 31, 2022.  If a taxpayer turns age 74 after December 31, 2032, the new RMD age will be 75 (but don't hold your breath on something that far into the future).


Returning to the discussion of giving an RMD to charity, it should be noted that this should probably only be considered by those who have planned out their retirements from a financial perspective and who have determined that they have adequate resources to fund their lifestyles and meet their needs, and still have funds available to donate to charity.  While the gift to charity of an RMD from an IRA can be outright with no strings attached, as noted in the first paragraph above, some taxpayers may take a little comfort by making the gift and also retaining an income stream.  The total amount that can be donated by an individual to a charitable gift annuity to benefit a nonprofit in a tax year (and in a lifetime) is limited to $50,000 (a spouse has a separate $50,000 limit).  These income streams that are paid by the nonprofits to the donors under these arrangements will depend on tables produced by the IRS and will be dependent on a taxpayer's age.  At the taxpayer's death, any amounts remaining will go to the charity.  While in many cases the income stream will not be large - perhaps in the range of 5% to 6% - the retained income stream might provide that extra bit of comfort that is needed by the donor.  It should be noted, however, that the payout rates increase based on the age of the donor at the time the annuity is funded.   


The annuity must be funded exclusively by QCDs and must commence with fixed payments of 5% or greater not later than one year from the date of funding.  The value of the annuity  and the remainder interest is determined under IRS interest rates and actuarial tables.  Only the individual and his or her spouse may receive the annuity  distributions  and the distributions  are not assignable.  It should also be kept in mind that depending on the amount of the individual's investment income from all sources, the annuity payments may be subject to the 3.8% net investment income tax, whereas the RMDs that are taken into income by an individual are not subject to the net investment income tax.


Not all charities are set up to offer this option to their donors, but it should be expected that this option will become more widespread in the months and years ahead.  If you are age 70 1/2 in 2023, inclined for charitable giving, and have adequate financial resources to last your lifetime, consider contacting your favorite nonprofit to see if they can accommodate a charitable gift annuity. 

14 Dec, 2023
With year-end approaching, it is time to start thinking about moves that may help lower your tax bill for this year and next. This year’s planning is more challenging than usual due to changes made by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and the SECURE 2.0 Act.
14 Dec, 2023
With year-end approaching, it is time to start thinking about moves that may help lower your business's taxes for this year and next.
By Greg Dowell 13 Nov, 2023
Catching many businesses by surprise, this Act kicks in with filing requirements as early as January 1, 2024.
By Greg Dowell 05 Sep, 2023
Having a business fail for lack of employees was unheard of 10 years ago. The problem existed for many businesses long before the pandemic, but it certainly went to a whole new level from 2020 to the present.
By Greg Dowell 24 Aug, 2023
Improve profitability, reduce the opportunity for fraud, focus on your core business, eliminate excuses for tardy financial data - what's not to love about outsourcing your accounting?
By Greg Dowell 16 Aug, 2023
ESOPs have been around for years; they could be a solution for ownership transition.
By Greg Dowell 16 May, 2023
by Gregory S. Dowell Updated May 16, 2023 Spring is the traditional kick-off to wedding season, and thoughts quickly turn to the wedding venue, gifts, the happy couple, and, of course, the guest list. Lurking somewhere in the shadows, behind even that strange uncle you barely know, is another guest that needs to be considered: The tax impact on the newlyweds. To start, newlyweds will have two options for filing their income taxes in the year of marriage: Filing status can either be married filing jointly, or married filing separately. In the vast majority of cases, a couple will benefit with a lower overall tax burden to the couple by choosing to file married filing jointly. One of the classic cases where a couple may consider filing separately is when one spouse has significant amounts of medical expenses for the year. Medical expenses are only deductible if they exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income; using only one spouse's income may allow a deduction to be taken if filing separately, compared to losing the medical deduction entirely if both incomes are combined by filing jointly. We previously had written about the tax trap that often occurs when two people get married, resulting often in an unanticipated balance due when the first joint tax return for the couple was filed. While President Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), changed the dynamics somewhat, it is still worthwhile to put pen to paper before saying “I do”. Prospective spouses have the opportunity to save money by taking income tax considerations into account before tying the knot. That’s particularly true for those who plan to marry late this year or early next year. As this article explains, from the federal income tax standpoint, some individuals marrying next year may come out ahead by either deferring or accelerating income, depending on their circumstances. Others may find it to their advantage to defer a year-end marriage until next year. For some quick background, a “marriage penalty” exists whenever the tax on a couple’s joint return is more than the combined taxes each spouse would pay if they weren’t married and each filed a single or head of household income tax return. Before President Trump’s TCJA, only the 10% and 15% married filing jointly brackets were set at twice that of the singles bracket, and so the marriage penalty effect on joint filers applied in the brackets above the 15% bracket. Beginning with the 2018 tax year, however, the TCJA set the statutory tax brackets for marrieds filing jointly-through the 32% bracket-at twice the amount of the corresponding tax brackets for singles. As a result, the TCJA eliminated any tax-bracket-generated marriage penalty effect for joint filers where each spouse has roughly the same amount of taxable income-through the 32% bracket. For example, if two individuals who each have $215,950 of taxable income file as single taxpayers for 2022, each would have a tax bill of $49,335.50, for a combined total of $98,671. If they were married, their tax bill as marrieds filing jointly would be $98,671, exactly the same amount as the combined total tax they’d pay as single taxpayers. Because the 35% bracket for marrieds filing jointly isn’t twice the amount of the singles 35% bracket, the marriage penalty effect will still apply to joint filers whose income falls in the 35% bracket. Using 2022 tax tables, two single taxpayers may each have $500,000 in taxable income, for a combined total of $1,000,000, without having any of it taxed higher than 35%. However, for marrieds filing jointly, the 35% tax bracket ends at $647,850 in taxable income, and each additional dollar of taxable income taxed at 37%. Thus, where two high-earning unmarried taxpayers with substantially equal amounts of taxable income are planning for their marriage to take place either late this year or early next, it may pay from the tax viewpoint to defer the marriage until next year. As an example, if two individuals each have $539,900 of taxable income file as single taxpayers for 2023, each would have a tax bill of $162,718, for a combined total of $325,436. If they were married before the end of the year, their tax bill as marrieds filing jointly would be $334,076, or $8,640 more than the combined total tax they’d pay as single taxpayers. If only one of the prospective spouses has substantial income, marriage and the filing of a joint return may save taxes, thus resulting in a marriage bonus. The bonus is the result of two factors: 1) the tax brackets for marrieds filing jointly cover wider spans of income than the tax brackets for taxpayers as singles; and 2) the taxable income of the lower-earning individual may not push the couple’s combined income into a higher tax bracket. In such a case, it will probably be better from the tax standpoint to accelerate the marriage into this year if feasible. There are a number of other factors that should also be taken into account when determining the effect of a marriage on income taxes of the couple. As mentioned early in this post, the first decision is to verify that filing a joint return is preferred to filing separate returns. In addition, many provisions of the tax code phase out completely (or decrease partially) as adjusted gross income increases. In a perfect world, there would only be good surprises for a newlywed couple following their wedding. To avoid any unpleasant income tax surprises, we always recommend that a newlywed couple take the time to make a projection of what their income will look like when combined as a couple, and determine what the tax bill will look like, at the Federal and State levels. After all, planning ahead, communicating with each other, discussing finances, and avoiding unpleasant surprises are some of the keys to a long marriage.
By Greg Dowell 11 Mar, 2023
Don't forget a birthday, anniversary, or any of these tax filing dates . . .
By Greg Dowell 07 Feb, 2023
The IRS asks taxpayers to wait to file 1040s if they received rebate payments from their state in 2022.
By Greg Dowell 04 Jan, 2023
Corporate Jet - What's the right choice for your business?
More Posts
Share by: