Blog Layout

Filing An Extension Can Be A Good Tax Strategy

Aug 24, 2017

by Gregory S. Dowell

August 24, 2017


As due dates approach, some taxpayers refuse to even consider filing an extension, an opinion that is not based on fact, but on fear. The folklore is that filing an extension raises the risk of an audit by the IRS. There is absolutely no statistical evidence to support that opinion, and any professional who has been in the tax preparation business will tell you that there is no anecdotal basis to support that folklore. Filing an extension does not increase audit risk, regardless of whether the taxpayer is an individual, corporation, or partnership.


Conversely, rushing to file a tax return before the original due date without filing an extension may not be in the taxpayer’s best interests. Think about what often happens to taxpayers with more sophisticated returns (or to taxpayers who simply have a difficult time gathering their information): As the original due date nears, the taxpayer realizes that certain key information is either missing or not yet available. In an irrational effort to avoid an extension, the taxpayer will estimate the missing information or omit the missing information from the tax return.


Either action can cause an error that may later trigger additional penalties and interest, or that limits flexibility. In such a case, filing a return with estimates may precipitate the need to file an amended return for the taxpayer, when the missing information is finally received and when it differs materially from the estimate that was used. Importantly, the professional cost of filing an original return, and then filing an amended return, will typically be considerably more than the cost of filing an extension and then filing only one tax return.


Our position at Dowell Group has always been that we prefer to file extensions when there is a strategic need. That strategic need may be due to:

  1. Client needs more time to gather accurate information; perhaps key charitable information is missing, or the client has been traveling.
  2. Information is missing, perhaps due to late-arriving documentation from 3rd parties (K-1s, cost basis for stocks sold, or 1099 forms, for instance).
  3. More time is needed to gain clarity on a key matter (for example, considering the possible need to include distributions from an estate or trust).


Clearly, there are relatively simple returns where the information is available, the clients are organized, there are no 3rd party documentation issues, and there is virtually no benefit to filing an extension. In those cases, we believe it is in the client’s best interests to file the return by the original due date. CPA firms that have good controls begin preparing extensions well in advance of the actual due date and never on the due date. For instance, in consideration of the April 15th due date, a CPA firm might begin to prepare extensions on April 10th. The reason for this is two-fold: 1) the CPA firm is dealing with a volume of client returns, and it simply takes time for its personnel, its computer systems, and the governmental bodies to process those extensions, and 2) the CPA firm needs to insure by a system of cross-checking and controls, that all necessary extensions were filed for its clients, a matter that can not be done at the last minute. Because of the processing time for extensions, as a practical matter, a client should expect that any return that is not in final form a week before the due date will probably be extended.

14 Dec, 2023
With year-end approaching, it is time to start thinking about moves that may help lower your tax bill for this year and next. This year’s planning is more challenging than usual due to changes made by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and the SECURE 2.0 Act.
14 Dec, 2023
With year-end approaching, it is time to start thinking about moves that may help lower your business's taxes for this year and next.
By Greg Dowell 14 Nov, 2023
How to make doing good a little less frightening financially.
By Greg Dowell 13 Nov, 2023
Catching many businesses by surprise, this Act kicks in with filing requirements as early as January 1, 2024.
By Greg Dowell 05 Sep, 2023
Having a business fail for lack of employees was unheard of 10 years ago. The problem existed for many businesses long before the pandemic, but it certainly went to a whole new level from 2020 to the present.
By Greg Dowell 24 Aug, 2023
Improve profitability, reduce the opportunity for fraud, focus on your core business, eliminate excuses for tardy financial data - what's not to love about outsourcing your accounting?
By Greg Dowell 16 Aug, 2023
ESOPs have been around for years; they could be a solution for ownership transition.
By Greg Dowell 16 May, 2023
by Gregory S. Dowell Updated May 16, 2023 Spring is the traditional kick-off to wedding season, and thoughts quickly turn to the wedding venue, gifts, the happy couple, and, of course, the guest list. Lurking somewhere in the shadows, behind even that strange uncle you barely know, is another guest that needs to be considered: The tax impact on the newlyweds. To start, newlyweds will have two options for filing their income taxes in the year of marriage: Filing status can either be married filing jointly, or married filing separately. In the vast majority of cases, a couple will benefit with a lower overall tax burden to the couple by choosing to file married filing jointly. One of the classic cases where a couple may consider filing separately is when one spouse has significant amounts of medical expenses for the year. Medical expenses are only deductible if they exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income; using only one spouse's income may allow a deduction to be taken if filing separately, compared to losing the medical deduction entirely if both incomes are combined by filing jointly. We previously had written about the tax trap that often occurs when two people get married, resulting often in an unanticipated balance due when the first joint tax return for the couple was filed. While President Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), changed the dynamics somewhat, it is still worthwhile to put pen to paper before saying “I do”. Prospective spouses have the opportunity to save money by taking income tax considerations into account before tying the knot. That’s particularly true for those who plan to marry late this year or early next year. As this article explains, from the federal income tax standpoint, some individuals marrying next year may come out ahead by either deferring or accelerating income, depending on their circumstances. Others may find it to their advantage to defer a year-end marriage until next year. For some quick background, a “marriage penalty” exists whenever the tax on a couple’s joint return is more than the combined taxes each spouse would pay if they weren’t married and each filed a single or head of household income tax return. Before President Trump’s TCJA, only the 10% and 15% married filing jointly brackets were set at twice that of the singles bracket, and so the marriage penalty effect on joint filers applied in the brackets above the 15% bracket. Beginning with the 2018 tax year, however, the TCJA set the statutory tax brackets for marrieds filing jointly-through the 32% bracket-at twice the amount of the corresponding tax brackets for singles. As a result, the TCJA eliminated any tax-bracket-generated marriage penalty effect for joint filers where each spouse has roughly the same amount of taxable income-through the 32% bracket. For example, if two individuals who each have $215,950 of taxable income file as single taxpayers for 2022, each would have a tax bill of $49,335.50, for a combined total of $98,671. If they were married, their tax bill as marrieds filing jointly would be $98,671, exactly the same amount as the combined total tax they’d pay as single taxpayers. Because the 35% bracket for marrieds filing jointly isn’t twice the amount of the singles 35% bracket, the marriage penalty effect will still apply to joint filers whose income falls in the 35% bracket. Using 2022 tax tables, two single taxpayers may each have $500,000 in taxable income, for a combined total of $1,000,000, without having any of it taxed higher than 35%. However, for marrieds filing jointly, the 35% tax bracket ends at $647,850 in taxable income, and each additional dollar of taxable income taxed at 37%. Thus, where two high-earning unmarried taxpayers with substantially equal amounts of taxable income are planning for their marriage to take place either late this year or early next, it may pay from the tax viewpoint to defer the marriage until next year. As an example, if two individuals each have $539,900 of taxable income file as single taxpayers for 2023, each would have a tax bill of $162,718, for a combined total of $325,436. If they were married before the end of the year, their tax bill as marrieds filing jointly would be $334,076, or $8,640 more than the combined total tax they’d pay as single taxpayers. If only one of the prospective spouses has substantial income, marriage and the filing of a joint return may save taxes, thus resulting in a marriage bonus. The bonus is the result of two factors: 1) the tax brackets for marrieds filing jointly cover wider spans of income than the tax brackets for taxpayers as singles; and 2) the taxable income of the lower-earning individual may not push the couple’s combined income into a higher tax bracket. In such a case, it will probably be better from the tax standpoint to accelerate the marriage into this year if feasible. There are a number of other factors that should also be taken into account when determining the effect of a marriage on income taxes of the couple. As mentioned early in this post, the first decision is to verify that filing a joint return is preferred to filing separate returns. In addition, many provisions of the tax code phase out completely (or decrease partially) as adjusted gross income increases. In a perfect world, there would only be good surprises for a newlywed couple following their wedding. To avoid any unpleasant income tax surprises, we always recommend that a newlywed couple take the time to make a projection of what their income will look like when combined as a couple, and determine what the tax bill will look like, at the Federal and State levels. After all, planning ahead, communicating with each other, discussing finances, and avoiding unpleasant surprises are some of the keys to a long marriage.
By Greg Dowell 11 Mar, 2023
Don't forget a birthday, anniversary, or any of these tax filing dates . . .
By Greg Dowell 07 Feb, 2023
The IRS asks taxpayers to wait to file 1040s if they received rebate payments from their state in 2022.
More Posts
Share by: